The Problem With Traditional Financial Planning

Have you ever met with a financial planner? If yoube exact to the penny. For example,
haven't, you can expect to go through a certain$5,387,234.23.You will look at the plan and you will think,
process. You will be asked about your financial goals."My gosh, there is no way I can do this!" You may get
One of your goals will likely be that you want to planstarted doing a few things that the planner
for retirement.You will be asked about your presentrecommends. But it won't last very long and you'll go
income. You know the answer to that one. You will beright back to doing things the way you've always done
asked about your expenses. That one will be tough.them.So what's wrong with the traditional financial
Everyone underestimates their expenses becauseplanning process? Plenty! First of all, it's ridiculous to try
most of us have no idea what we're really spendingto look decades in the future to predict what's going to
and what we're spending it on.You will be asked aboutbe happening in your life. I don't know about you, but I
your assets -- what you own. You know what youdon't know what's going to happen tomorrow, much
own, but it will be tough to put a market value on someless decades from now.
of it. You will be asked about your liabilities -- what youAlso, traditional financial planning doesn't take into
owe. For most people, facing the reality of their debtsaccount what financial freedom actually is. You're
is rather daunting.You will be asked when you want tofinancially free when your passive income (money you
retire. I would say the average age most people givedon't have to work for) equals your expenses.So if
is 55 years old. I don't know why that is, but 55 seemsyou have no passive income right now and your
to be a popular number. Then the financial planner willexpenses are $50,000 a year, and you can get a 10%
tell you that you will need to accumulate enoughreturn on your investments, you need to accumulate
money to live another 40 or 45 years after retirement.$500,000 to become financially free.
After all, if you live to 90 or 95 you don't want to runIf you can get a higher return on your money, you can
out of money, do you?You will also be asked aboutreduce the amount that must be accumulated. If you
your risk tolerance so that the planner can determinesettle for a lesser return because you're risk averse,
what kind of annual rate of return to factor in for youryou will need to accumulate more. You should also
investments. If you say you have a low risk tolerance,consider inflation. Of course, if you invest for inflation, it
the planner will consider low-risk investments that willwill already be factored into your
give you a lower rate of return. If you say you have ainvestments.Understanding financial freedom as the
high risk tolerance, investments that could provide apoint where your passive income equals your
higher rate of return will be considered. You can't haveexpenses is a much more realistic way to look at it.
it both ways. If you don't take risks, you can't get aMost people who are committed to being financially
very high rate of return on your investments.Then allfree can achieve their goal in a matter of a few years,
that information will be dumped into a financial planningnot decades.Copyright 2005Larry Holmes invites you
software program. The software will print out a planto visit
that will say you need to accumulate several millionYour common sense guide for financial and
dollars by the time you're 55 years old. Oh, and it willinvestment success.